🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy presents a misguided assessment of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" agendas pose an grave threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

A Glaring Growth Divide Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a sobering contrast. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a paltry 13.5% growth for the European Union. During this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than several leading European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, about half of the world’s 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The scene of global tech leadership is decidedly American. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This gap prompts a pressing question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe stand? Experts widely concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

Several key factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a true unified investment market, a factor that limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided regulation hamper European business. A US startup can launch a service under one set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population size, is divided among 27 separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these hurdles, there are reasons for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have started to propose serious reform. Notable reports on European competitiveness and the single market point to the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets could support much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

Europe still possesses significant advantages: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements have the potential to unleash a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now stands at a decisive crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, without bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.